Poster verdict precedence
When a poster carries contradictory data points, apply this order:
- Scammer is absolute — one matching data point decides the case regardless of age.
- A +test alias in the poster’s email outranks everything below.
- Otherwise the newest data point wins.
"TS redirecting candidates" is a policy note, not a scam verdict. On its own it resolves to cleared. It only counts as scammer when the same comment also carries an explicit verdict word (rejected, banned, scammer).